That it is none other than God the Word, who exists in the form of God the Father, the impress of his very being,[1] who is equal in all things to the one who begot him, who has emptied himself out. And what is this emptying out? It is his life in the form of a slave, in the flesh that he assumes, it is the likeness to us of one who is not as we are in his own nature, since he is above all creation. In this way he humbled himself, economically submitting himself to the limitations of humanity. But even so he was God, for he did not have as a gift what pertained to him by nature. This was why he also said to God the Father who is in heaven, Father, glorify me with that glory I had with you before the world was.[2] I do not think that they would say that it was David’s descendant, born in the last times of this age, who was reclaiming as his own a glory that predated the world, at least if he is a different son and distinct from the true and natural Son? No, surely this is a saying that befits the Godhead? It was necessary, yes necessary, that he should be conformed to us in the limitations of humanity while at the same time he authentically enjoyed transcendent divine status within his own essential being; just as it is with the Father. How can the saying be true: You must not introduce another god among you, if according to them[3] a man is deified by a conjunction with the Word and is said to be enthroned with God so as to share the Father’s dignity?