8 entries
Jonas 4:1-11 8 entries

THE AMBIVALENCE OF JONAH

JONAH’S FIRST THOUGHT.

St. John Chrysostom (c. 347–407)

After he preached in the midst of Nineveh, he went out of the city in order to observe if anything should happen. When he saw that three days had passed and nothing had happened anywhere near what was threatened, he then put forward his first thought and said, Are these not my words that I was saying that God is merciful and longsuffering and repents for people’s evils?

Homilies on Repentance and Almsgiving 2.20

JONAH’S INDIGNATION.

St. Jerome (c. 347–420)

But God will reply by the mouth of Jeremiah, At what instant I will speak concerning a nation, and concerning a kingdom, to pluck up, and to break down, and to destroy it; if that nation, concerning what I have spoken, turn from their evil, I will repent of the evil that I thought to do to them. And at what instant I will speak concerning a nation, and concerning a kingdom, to build and to plant it; if it does evil in my sight, that it obeys not my voice, then I will repent of the good wherewith I said I would benefit them.[1] Jonah was indignant because, at God’s command, he had spoken falsely; but his sorrow was proved to be ill founded, since he would rather speak truth and have a countless multitude perish than speak falsely and have them saved.

Against the Pelagians 3

JONAH EXPECTED THE DESTRUCTION OF NINEVEH.

St. Cyril of Alexandria (c. 376–444)

The days being now past, after which it was time that the things foretold should be accomplished, and his anger as yet taking no effect, Jonah understood that God had pity on Nineveh. Still he does not give up all hope, and thinks that a respite of the evil has been granted them on their willingness to repent, but that some effect of his displeasure would come, since the pains of their repentance had not equaled their offenses. So thinking in himself apparently, he departs from the city and waits to see what will become of them. He expected, apparently, that it would either fall by an earthquake or be burned with fire, like Sodom.

Commentary on Jonah 4.5

THE SALVATION OF THE GENTILES GREATER THAN JONAH’S SHADE.

St. Augustine of Hippo (354–430)

But when Jonah made himself a booth and sat down opposite the city of Nineveh, waiting to see what would befall it, the prophet played a part of different significance. He was a type of the carnal people of Israel, for he was sad over the preservation of the Ninevites! He was frustrated over the redemption and salvation of the Gentiles! This is why Christ came to call not the just but sinners to repentance.[1] But the shadow of the vine over his head was the promise of the Old Testament. Its law manifested, as the apostle says, a shadow of things to come.[2] God was offering shade from the heat of temporal evils in the land of promise.

But the worm came in the morning. It gnawed at the vine and withered it. For when the gospel had been published by Christ’s mouth, all those things withered and faded away. The shade of the vine symbolized temporal prosperity for the Israelites. And now those people have lost the kingdom of Jerusalem and their priesthood and sacrifice. All of this was a foreshadowing of the future. They were scattered abroad in captivity and afflicted with a great flood of suffering, just as Jonah—so it is written—suffered grievously from the heat of the sun. Yet the salvation of penitent nations is preferred to Jonah’s suffering and the shade that he loved.

Letter 102.6

THE LESSON OF DIVINE MERCY.

Theodoret of Cyr (c. 393–c. 458) verse 8

When he admitted to feeling this way to the extent of preferring death to life on this account, God said, I call you as judge. Consider, then, if it is right for you to grieve over the pumpkin vine, which you did not cultivate, neither planting it nor watering it. It came into being at dawn, and a worm and the sun proved its ruin at day’s end. For my part, on the contrary, is it right for me to treat without mercy this city, which was brought into being by me, containing more than 120,000 inhabitants who do not know their right hand from their left, and many cattle? Give thought to this, then, and marvel at the lovingkindness for its reasonableness.

Commentary on Jonah 4.10-11

FOCUS MORE ON REDEMPTION THAN JUDGMENT.

St. Ambrose of Milan (c. 333–397) verse 11

The next day the book of Jonah was read according to custom, and when it was finished I began this sermon: Brothers, a book has been read in which it is prophesied that sinners shall return to repentance. It is understood to mean that they may hope for the future in the present. I added that the just man had been willing to receive even blame, so as not to see or prophesy destruction for the city. And because that sentence was mournful, he grew sad when the vine withered. God said to the prophet, Are you sad over the vine? Jonah answered, I am sad. The Lord said that if he was grieving because the vine had withered, how much greater should his care be for the salvation of so many people! And, in fact, he did away with the destruction that had been prepared for the entire city.

Letter 60

THE PURITY OF THE INNOCENT SPARES THE GUILTY.

Salvian the Presbyter (c. 400-c. 480) verse 11

When, at one time, God had been offended by the sins of the Ninevites, he was appeased by the crying and wailing of children. For though we read that the whole people wept, yet the lot of innocence of the little ones merited the greatest mercy. God said to Jonah, You are greatly grieved over the vine. And a little later, Should I not spare Nineveh, the great city, in which there are more than 120,000 persons, who know not their left hand from their right hand? He thereby declared that because of the purity of the innocent ones, he was also sparing the faults of the guilty ones.

Letter 4

CARING FOR THOSE UNABLE TO DISCERN GOOD FROM EVIL.

St. Jerome (c. 347–420) verse 11

We read of Eli the priest that he became displeasing to God on account of the sins of his children.[1] And we are told that a man may not be made a bishop if his sons are loose and disorderly.[2] It is written of the woman that she shall be saved in childbearing, if she continues in faith and charity and holiness with chastity.[3] If then parents are responsible for their children when these are of ripe age and independent, how much more must they be responsible for them when, still unweaned and weak, they cannot, in the Lord’s words, discern between their right hand and their left, when, that is to say, they cannot yet distinguish good from evil?

Letter 107.6